By my standards that's a pretty provocative title for a blog post. But otherwise I do not know how to sum up the law today decided otherwise.
Contrary to the advice of all experts, against the advice of the Social Council of the SPD (which include Andrew Wall, spokesman for the 1 & 1 is part of), contrary to> 135,000 people to the online petition against any substantive arguments, that is contrary to any common sense have the CDU and SPD (with some exceptions) now provides access to child pornography law aggravation waved through in communication networks, thus the one hand the separation of powers, on the other lifted and placed the first step to a censorship infrastructure.
Separation of powers, which is pretty crucial for a Demokratio is, so on, as both the BKA future decision makers, as well as his executive power to the locks is. It therefore determines whether a page is blocked, and if this barrier then themselves. What's more, that the list of sites to be blocked to be secret. Well, this will change nothing in it that will be released sooner or later at wikileaks.org, but a list of the secret, opens the door to abuse. Which the SPD wanted to counter in which an independent monitoring body an eye on this list and have to file an objection can be.
The first step on the road to censorship infrastructure is in turn made because it, like one of the left or the Greens so beautifully said, it is as safe as the Amen in the church, that the demand will come after more locks. Extra locks of "killer games" that are also called shortly after adoption for approval. And so it will not be long until a demand after another and one or the other but is made to do so. And even though the SPD, so the law really wanted to make a special law, that such is not so easy. Not so easy but unfortunately not.
It was further ignored completely that it would be for the BKA proven possible to obtain a Abuse-mail to the respective providers the cancellation of the doubt disgusting content. From "Delete instead Lock made the grand coalition a" clear lock then "and sold it also as a result of the discussion with the community."

I've just now 2 / 3 Reading on the future law fully considered and I am stunned, in fact, how resistant the proponents of the barriers against the arguments from the network were. The only ones where you could listen, without anything to do was submit to the Greens, the Left and the FDP. Tauss the Lord I need mention, of course, not everything that should be ignored by his party colleagues altogether. Fortunately he was able to obtain still belongs.

Now even the minimal hope is on the Federal Council, or the Mr. Köhler. However, I've got no great hopes, and thus is again only the previously announced way before the Constitutional Court. First, because of the law, partly because there are many defects in shape around the law is, as one of the opposition noted during his speech to show that everything is knitted with very hot needle. The best was still that good Ursula "Zensursula" von der Leyen in general was not present.

As a first step, we entered an open / free name server, if only in protest!

In sum, however, does all this mean that I have fully apolitical person's nose and in the foreseeable future as a political move will pirate. Somehow you have to set an example and I would not later have to tell me: If you had not done what, when you had the chance.
I'm afraid the wind that blows against the old parties in this election campaign is not strong enough, but they will feel it and it will change something. It _must_ include the change was!
In future, the political posts are more rather than less so .. is so "unfortunately" not different. As it said Kris Köhntopp last goes: "I would like to forgive me behind my display and continue to work on exciting technical things, rather than to concern myself with all this political nonsense. It's just not, you will not let me. "